Anyone who leads a relatively high number of longevity among vegetarians, then gets "insidious" the question of why there are many examples of longevity and among nations, not disdain more fatty meat.
While our press gradually engaged vegetarian propaganda, but it in such innocuous height ...
For example, you can read in the newspaper curtailed little note that in Germany, conducted a survey and found: vegetarians blood viscosity and blood pressure is lower than that of those who eat meat.
For themselves vegetarians is old "news." There is much more meat-eaters, they write in the paper, so developing atherosclerosis and heart attack.
These little note - just an excuse for a wife to see her husband for dinner:
- Vasya, stop. Fifth cutlet, perhaps, leave for breakfast, not a heart attack shlopochesh atherosclerosis. Who me this note yesterday about vegetarians read? ...
Let us open the book of L. Bobrov "Let's talk about demographics," released in the series "Eureka" in 1974, author says: "Soon after the 1959 census were examined at the same time more than 40,000 people aged 80 years and over ... almost all were lean . exception was not only fat, but just full. Vegetarians were only 10 percent. still less those who ate mostly meat. majority preferred the variety of food ... "
Let's think carefully what is meant by "only 10 percent." They mean misunderstanding by the author bias: if the general population almost typed tenth of a percent of vegetarians, or one person in a thousand, and among the oldest old is ten percent of them, that is, one thousand one hundred people, it turns out that vegatariantsev, even though they make a lot of mistakes in the diet, yet a hundred times more likely to get in centenarians than in those who "prefer variety in the food."
Here's how to distort the statistics are perfectly clear! And this "wise" roams conclusion, by the way, the pages of popular literature, the reader swallows it without thinking, and the authors re-write it, too, without bothering our valued convolutions. This is called "not to see at close range.
Fair to consider the fact that, along with, say, long-lived, the Abkhazians who use a lot of grapes, fruits, vegetables and herbs, which are the main food lacto-vegetarian, high yields and longevity of Kabardino-Balkaria, where they eat a lot of fatty meat, and only what about not paradise conditions in Yakutia, with its harsh climate? And there, among the Yakut and Evenki, many centenarians.
What's the matter? And the fact that certain groups of the population, have long been living in a particular locality, differ in some features of the physiology of the body ("adaptive group").
Say Nganasans become resistant to a particularly fatty food, the corresponding enzyme that breaks down fat, they are much more active.
How did this happen? By ill natural selection. Children are not born equal, and those who from birth had posposobnee to digest fatty foods to survive and produce offspring in which the sign was fixed and strengthened from generation to generation, again through severe selection.
In general we can say that human nature was and is a vegetarian, and some populations of people living in conditions that are far from the source, which lived millions of years our ancestors, the price of natural selection become ill only a resistance to new and hostile factors environment, including to the wrong foods.
But the path to vegetarianism is open to these populations and would have been for them, no doubt beneficial. Professor W. Bunak, the outstanding Soviet anthropologist, in comments to the book by Harrison et al, "Human Biology" (R, 1968) expresses this idea: "The experiment found that some individuals can easily adapt to the food-rich fats.
It would be interesting to find out whether the same is easy to change from the usual fat-rich animal food to feeding only plant-based foods, and whether the population as a whole, without prejudice to himself to complete this transition within a single generation. "
Does not require proof of common knowledge: that contributes to health, and prolong life.
Which speaks in recent times gerontology? To quote the famous Kiev scientist, Corresponding Member of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences V. Frolkis: "It should be stressed, aging - a complex, mnogozvenevoy process, because the most effective may impact directly on many of the" hot spots "of the aging organism. And, you know, a very effective was the easiest! For example, energy malnutrition, but qualitatively good nutrition. And thoroughly tested this recipe. Even if they ignore the advice in this respect the ancient healers, still a long time, at the dawn of this century, has been scientifically proven, confirmed in dozens of laboratories around the world that limited nutrition prolongs the life of experimental animals by 50-100 percent. while they have dramatically slowed the pace of age and adverse changes.'s this pattern to some extent appropriate people. And follow our Institute show: What was the last high-calorie food is an elderly man, the brighter expressed his pathological changes of the cardiovascular system. "
There is no doubt that excessive protein diet and can be one of the main reasons (if not the) acceleration, early maturing youth, including sexually.
Acceleration at all is a sign of the overall reduction in life expectancy.
In young athletes, Muscovites, the observations of Professor. RE Motylyanskaya, puberty slowed by a half to two years.
But in general, young people now mature for three years before! And until we reconstruct the power, bringing it to its natural maximum, acceleration will remain undefeated.
It's not all young people without exception soon will spend leisure stadiums against acceleration, here - on the contrary - rather want to grow up!
And death from a heart attack in the 30-40 years had ceased to be a rarity.
Having said that, I think, that in the experiments contained rawfoodist also called deep moral social meaning.
This way of eating is associated with the problem of human survival in an emergency.
But the main value of naturism, especially for our society is that it instills a moment man's responsibility to society for their own health, despite bytuyuschey view that health - is the work of our doctors to them for power, money paid, and our part to squander it is hit or miss, since it, too, "state property."
Naturists - in the forefront of those who responded to the call of the academician Amosov "make fashion to health."
But old habits are hard to break, much easier - together, and for other suitable only such an extreme way, both vegetarian settlements (colonies). While this is, as they say, "an amateur" ...
Circumstances are such that a person can make a turn to a healthy life only exclude themselves from society for feeding.
It must be noted that the recognition of the problem and further development of the raw food diet are fraught with further opportunities to improve the efficiency of the economy.
Because livestock is too expensive and therefore has no long term.
Figures for the USSR I do not, but in Hungary, for example, 61 percent of the land used for agriculture, is, directly or indirectly, for the production and meet the needs of livestock feed.
Hungarian economist Pal shuffling, resulting in the data in his book "Agriculture 6uduschego" rightly draws attention to the fact that agriculture is for man and not vice versa. "
Bulk raw food would end service animals, pets porabascheniyu person.
Become a serious problem and the poisoning of livestock waste environment. Air, even at a considerable distance around livestock buildings filled with little caressing smell odors, and in addition, and positive ions, depressing vital functions in the human body.
On a planet destroyed two-thirds of forest to plant crops ... But in the future people will come back to the forest, which he will have to plant when the soil is completely depleted.
Again, feed it will be mostly trees and shrubs, giving the fruits, berries and nuts. Yes, vegetable plantations.
Has estimated that grown on each hectare of forest organic matter much more that which can give the field: wood is 4-5 times more productive than the arable land.
Man - the conqueror of Nature is the white flag.
But - so far only in environmental terms. The next step - medicine, more and more attention is paid to human ecology.
Appeals to live in harmony with nature, we hear more than enough. But how to do it, just only know some naturists, so far very few.
- But not all issues are resolved by majority vote. And after them are more of those who knew Paul Bragg wise aphorism: "medicine - a half-measure, the cause of the disease remains outside of medicine, and medicine does not reach it."
If we want to live in harmony with nature - we have to accept its rules. Therefore, there is a need in the lessons counterculture - counterculture naturism, in studying naturopathy.
A member of the British Association of naturopaths Harry Benjamin, already mentioned here, said: "It may seem strange that so few people make so clear, simple and logical theory and practice of natural healing. Why not take her medicine minds, not to mention a member of the physician? Naturopathy and orthodox medicine - two very opposite phenomenon. To admit them to a new theory and practice, conventional medicine would have to completely give up all of their present ideas and start the job again. also plays a huge role and the conservatism of the human mind. And Which doctor with status, degree, status, honor have had the strength and the courage to admit that everything he teaches - wrong. So now there is no hope that conventional medicine would be able to revise their dogma, and finally , take the only sure way of natural treatments. Medicine will continue to "refine" his methods to invent new antibiotics, new vaccines, drugs, will be an even greater dexterity to cut people "excessive, unnecessary" organs. So what on earth will soon be difficult to meet a man who will not be cut off part of his body. But if there are still no hope, that everything - and doctors, and countless patients - understand that the way to health, only one - a natural treatment and natural way of life, are capable of at least, the individual person. "
We know that the idea could even overtake the time for hundreds of years, if she was born in a society that is not ready for its perception.
The Americans, however, only ten years old laughed ideas of Norbert Wiener, before you started making computers ... But as Victor Hugo said, there is nothing stronger than an idea whose time has come.
It seems that the time comes naturism. And in the next century humanity, perhaps, will make a passionate appeal Arshavir Ter-Hovhannisyan, he begins one of his books: "Raw vegetable products must be the only human food. Custom of eating cooked foods must end world once and for all . Such is the verdict of science. consumption of cooked - the worst in the history of barbarism, barbarism, not perceived by anyone, which is the unconscious victim of each. "
No comments:
Post a Comment